[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re: Non-tech Qu

Hi all!

    Well, i've been following this thread...researched a little.
Now I'm not even remotely close to educated in this matter, let
alone an expert.  I'm an expert at dirtbikes & computers.  Either
of those I can rip right through in nothing flat and tell you
anything you want to know and more ;)  But this thread, I don't
know.  I'll leave the debating to the higher-ups than myself.  I
personally don't see the TC as a wonder-device for sending "useful"
energy through the ground or air...A single-planed capacitor is a
hard concent to visualize from word descriptions for me, as I'm
sure the valving system of a front shock is to most other ppl.  My
opinion is that while the heavy math behind the TC is a wonder, and
still not completely understood, i'm fairly sure a high-priced
research group (govmnt. or private) would have already found this
answer.  Maybe it has been found, and stifled by the electric
monopolies, i dunno.  Not for me to worry about.  As for making
"useful" energy...they do to a point, but it's got to be the most
friggin unsafe and loud way to illuminate a flourescent light I've
ever tried :))   Just my $.02 :)  If it works, I'll humbly admit
ignorance and bow to the higher-ups, but till then I'll be
skeptical.  A little skepticisim and/or disbelief results in
vigirous research on the part of those who do believe.  It tends to
keep everybody busy :)

    Caio!
Shad

A few snips to keep the quote short...
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Sunday, May 21, 2000 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re:
Non-tech Qu


>Original Poster: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
>
>At 12:36 AM 05/18/2000 +0000, wysock-at-ttr-dot-com wrote:
>>
>>To Ruud, Bill, Ed, et. al.
>>
>>The writing below has cuase me to respond by saying that indeed,
>>Tesla's system of wireless power transmission _was not_ Hertzian
>>(TEM) electromagnetic wave propagation through the air as we all
>>know it and employ it today in all our modes of communications,
>>but rather a surface-launched wave over the sphere of the earth.
>>
>>Right now, there are folks who are working very hard to prove
what
>>Tesla said, more then 100 years ago; that indeed there is another
>>mode of electric wave propagation, and it doesn't attenuate by
the
>>1/r(sq) law that classical Hertzian transverse electro-magnetic
wave
>>propagation encounters.  This (novel) method of propagating
electric
>useful energy over a useful distance.  Many many people have tried
and, of
>course, the charlatans, are attracted to the subject like flies,
but where
>is the proof?  The Earth has been pounded with just about every
form of
>electromagnetic radiation imaginable and, so far, nothing unusual
has been
>noticed pounding back.  Many people really have tried to duplicate
and
>prove Tesla's concept.  But the results are universally nil.
>
> The surface of the Earth is not a pristine superconductor.  Bill
Parn's
>recent measurement of 600 ohms in 25 feet for the Earth's surface
>
>Perhaps the "folks" ?:o) can come up with something.  This old
thread needs
>some new life!!  I hope there are some "real" experiments
associated with
>it...  I am sure Malcolm would not mind running his coil in New
Zealand off
>my power meter in Colorado ;-))
>
>Cheers,
>
> Terry
> A known disbeliever...
>
>
>
>
>