Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re: Non-tech Qu

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re: Non-tech Qu
• From: "Ed Phillips" <evp-at-pacbell-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:05:20 -0600
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> Original Poster: "Ruud de Graaf" <rdegraaf-at-daxis.nl>
> 
> Hi Bill and Thomas,
> 
> Sorry that I apparently stood on your tail with my statement, but could you
> be so kind to post some references to these folks/scientists where you are
> talking about?
> 
> Ruud de Graaf

	Second the motion!!!!!  Corum's???

Ed


> 
> > Bill Wysock: 'Right now, there are folks who are working very hard to
> prove what
> > Tesla said, more then 100 years ago; that indeed there is another mode of
> electric wave
> > propagation, and it doesn't attenuate by the 1/r(sq) law that classical
> Hertzian transverse
> > electro-magnetic wave propagation encounters.'
> 
> > Thomas McGahee: 'Recently some scientists have been re-discovering some of
> the bits and
> > pieces of this particular puzzle.'

• Prev: NST
• Next: gmhei
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread