User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
Em 06/12/2019 16:04, Jay Howson escreveu:
You should correct it!! Surely one of your papers could be cited in place of the German one. Jay Howson
I will see what can I do. Looking at the history of editions it's
possible to find that by 12 March 2017 someone edited the text saying
that the secondary resonance frequency was 1/(2 pi sqrt((1-k^2)L2 C2).
This is true if the primary coil is kept in the circuit and
short-circuited, but the correct relation continues to be L1 C1=L2 C2.
The incorrect tuning relation was added too. Eventually the incorrect
references were added (I still could not find the Japanese paper.
Looking at the magazine issues in
https://toragi.cqpub.co.jp/tabid/826/Default.aspx to see if I find
something), and finally someone returned the expressions to the usual
form but kept the strange tuning relation. I corrected the Portuguese
version, that is simpler and apparently was changed by the same person.
Antonio Queiroz