[Home][2016 Index]
Stefan Yes, without doubt they ablate quicker than the 1/4 inch Tungsten (doped ones) that they replaced. In theroy going up from 1/4 to 3/8 should have meant less ablation anyway on account of the size change alone! I can't remember with certainty what the original (replaced) 1/4 inch Tungsten ones were doped with though, but I think that disc used Zirconiated ones. Obviously I'm talking about ablation on the fixed ones, as in any setup the flying or revolving pair rarely seem to ablate. I can't recall the % values of Cu to W of the ones I'm using, but I can find out from my colleague. Are they worth the expense (?) - well not really sure, as 3/8 inch Tungsten welding rods are not available in the UK, so it means you would have to import pure Tungsten slugs anyway if I had chosen that route. Regards Phil Tuck www.hvtesla.com -----Original Message----- From: Tesla [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Teslalabor Sent: 20 January 2016 13:10 To: Tesla Coil Mailing List Subject: Re: [TCML] Spark Gap Electrodes - Flat or Rounded Hi Phil, I'm actually upgrading my rotary and thinking about the correct electrode material. I also thought about using tungsten/copper (80% tungsten 20% copper) where the manufacturer says, it is way more stable (ablates much slower than pure tungsten). But you say, it ablates quicker, than pure tungsten? I'm a little bit confused now... Also thermal and electric conductivity is much better with tungsten/copper, also it is lighter... So why use pure tungsten? Regards, Stefan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil" <pip@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'Tesla Coil Mailing List'" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [TCML] Spark Gap Electrodes - Flat or Rounded > Matthew, > You can round out the ends of Tungsten (in my case 0.25") by a belt sander > or linisher, and using a drill. > It WILL wreck the belt though, but I find I can do eight ends on an > already > used belt ok. > Start the belt and chuck the Tungsten in the drill and simply hold against > revolving belt. I used to make half hemispheres but now I find just > rounding > the edges is sufficient - just need to lose the 90 degree edge. > > You can just make the curve out in third photo down: > http://www.hvtesla.com/srsg_2015.html (statics are 3/8 Tung / Copper, > revolving are pure Tungsten) > > Green welding rods (pure) are harder to do than those that are doped with > something, I have found though. > > Tungsten copper will cut very easily and you can round those with a file, > but it ablates quicker (3/8 inch Diam' on 7kw or so) > > > Phil > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tesla [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > msweeney23@xxxxxxxxx > Sent: 19 January 2016 00:26 > To: Tesla Coil Mailing List > Subject: Re: [TCML] Spark Gap Electrodes - Flat or Rounded > > Ok thanks, maybe ill just use screw on brass electrodes for now i dont > have > anything to round out tungsten. > > Sent from my HTC > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Carl Noggle" <cn8@xxxxxxx> > To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [TCML] Spark Gap Electrodes - Flat or Rounded > Date: Mon, Jan 18, 2016 6:12 PM > > All spark gaps should be rounded. The field enhancement at the edges of > a flat gap electrode will cause it to go into corona before the spark > forms, giving erratic operation. A radius of curvature less than about > 25% of the gap spacing will go into corona first. Also, with wear the > electrodes will eventually become rounded, requiring adjustment during > the process. (Nature usually knows best.) > > ---Carl > > > > > On 1/18/2016 4:21 PM, Matthew Sweeney wrote: >> I see a great deal of conflicting information regarding this, and I'm in >> the process of making my tungsten spark gap for a small single NST >> (12k/30ma) coil. >> >> Should I be using tungsten rods with flat ends, or rounded? I've heard > that >> rounded ends are good for safety gaps but actual spark gaps should have >> nice flattened ends. Is this true for static gaps and not just rotary > gaps? >> >> I will eventually make an RQ gap but starting off simple for now with a >> basic one or two static rod gap design. >> >> Any help appreciated! >> >> Matt >> _______________________________________________ >> Tesla mailing list >> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx >> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list > Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list > Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla > > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list > Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla