[Home][2016 Index]
So if using several NST’s in parallel… The PFC will not be a straight calculation. The DC resistance will be significantly lower. So be sure to get the accurate measurement… In javaTC I was given a value of 700 uF… In teslamap it came up with 3 F > On Dec 3, 2016, at 2:51 PM, Gary Lau <glau1024@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ron, > > I remember trying to meter the mains current with my coil running and try > various PFC cap values, looking for the lowest drawn current. > Unfortunately, particularly when using a static spark gap, the mains > current varies wildly from moment to moment. I was utterly unable to > experimentally determine if one value was better than another, although it > was clear that current with a PFC cap was lower than without. I think the > takeaway is that the optimal value is by no means critical, as if you were > trying to hit some kind of resonance. > > Regards, Gary Lau > MA, USA > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Ronald Reeland <ronreeland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I have been researching adding an A.C. power factor correction capacitor >> across the 120 volt primary of a 15,000 volt, 30 milliamp secondary neon >> sign transformer for a spark gap Tesla coil application. >> >> >> It appears that the power factor of an ordinary transformer without a >> built-in correction capacitor is 40 to 50 %. That means that the input >> volt/amps is around twice that of a "perfect" power factor of 100%. Of >> course we can never achieve a perfect 100%. >> >> >> But it appears a person can attain a 90% or greater power factor thus >> reducing the primary input current draw by calculating an approximate value >> of correction capacitor. >> >> >> Here is a power factor correction capacitor formula that I found on the >> web and in Brent Turner's book; "The Tesla Coil Book", how they work & how >> they are built" : >> >> PF Capacitor= "corrected kVA" x (10^9 divided by 2TT x Frequency x >> primary volts^2) or in a more compact form : C=kVA (10^9/2TT f e^2). >> >> >> There is a partial chart in Brent's book titled" PF-Corrected Transformer >> ratings" and complete charts on the web for various transformer output >> volts and current. It appears that the "corrected" output kVA is one half >> in some instances and 55% or so in other cases.So if I have computed the >> formula properly, a 15,000 volt, .030 amp transformer requires a 46 ufd >> A.C. capacitor across the transformer primary. This is based on the charts >> "corrected kVA" of .250. (The un-corrected kVA would be 15,000 x .030 or >> .450 kVA.) >> >> >> 1. I am asking for confirmation that all of above is true and that I >> manipulated the formula properly. >> >> 2. I assume that since the formula deals with secondary output, the >> lowered kVA is reflected in the 120 volt primary input and the current draw >> there is reduced in proportion. >> >> 3. Also, is the formula a starting point for adjusting the capacitor value >> higher or lower with an A.C. ammeter in the primary until the lowest input >> amperage is achieved? >> >> 4. I also assume the secondary must be under load while fine tuning the >> power factor capacitor value. >> >> 5. I have some 56 ufd, 250 volts A.C. motor-run capacitors (EPCOS brand) >> that I would like to try. >> >> >> Any help or corrections to my assumptions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ron Reeland >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tesla mailing list >> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx >> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla >> > _______________________________________________ > Tesla mailing list > Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla _______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla