[Home][2014 Index] Re: [TCML] SRSG @ 360 bps (60Hz) or 300 bps (50Hz) [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] SRSG @ 360 bps (60Hz) or 300 bps (50Hz)

Hi Phil,
big disadvantage is the unequal bang size you get with 300 and more bps in a SRSG based system. Your Microsim simulation shows this very nicely. You could try unequal spaced electrodes, so it might be possible to get equal bangs. This should let to a quiet impressive sound. 

Regards,
Stefan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil" <pip@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 3:22 PM
Subject: [TCML] SRSG @ 360 bps (60Hz) or 300 bps (50Hz)



All,

Having recently ran a 300 bps SRSG, I wondered if anyone else has built a
Synchronous RSG @ 360 bps (60Hz) or 300 bps (50Hz), and in particular has
any video of it? (YouTube is thin on the ground for SRSG's in general, let 
alone this particular speed) I am interested in the streamer behaviour and
the sound the coil produced which, with an SRSG, depends directly on the
phasing used.

Our own phasing was this
https://www.flickr.com/photos/33962508@N03/15722528281/ and the similarity 
in sound to a 120 (100) bps coil was uncanny.
I also wondered on their performance as opposed to a 120 (100) bps coil or a 
240 (200) bps coil,



Regards

Phil Tuck



www.hvtesla.com



_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla 

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla