User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
Several of these arguments are persuasive, I going to go a different route.
On 14-04-09 02:14 PM, Yurtle Turtle wrote:
> Are they aware of the intent to cycle 120 bps? It may work fine at several breaks per day, but 120 or so bps may not hold up.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: David Boyle <twoten@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 7:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [TCML] fluid quenched rotary spark gap
>
>
> "filled with dielectric oil."
>
> I will be using an oil specifically made for quenching electric arcs. If
> the manufacturers claims are to be believed it will not break down.
>
>
>
>
> On 14-04-08 11:11 PM, Chris Boden wrote:
>> I'm very curious to see the breakdown chemicals as a result of this.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:32 PM, David Boyle <twoten@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm planning to build a synchronous rotary spark gap with the terminals
>>> inside a fluid tight plastic box and filled with dielectric oil. This
>>> should cut down on the noise, allow me to use steel electrodes because
>>> of the lower temperatures, and it should quench like a champ. Has anyone
>>> had any experience building one of these?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tesla mailing list
>>> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla