Re: [TCML] RSG Upgrade Performance Video

[Scott Bogard <sdbogard@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nice job, Yeah for that cap size 240 clearly isn't the way to go, 240 
would be more effective for a system with enormous current draw, and/or 
a smaller cap.  Having tried both 120 and 240 on my second coil attempt, 
I can kind of mirror your experience, never got much out of 240, not 
enough current for my big-ish cap (unless I ran unballasted, which 
killed a lot of transformers.)  I'm sure you've posted specks before but 
as Gary mentioned, we would like to see construction of the device, as 
well as know details, power supply cap etc.  Again good job!

Scott Bogard.

On 6/9/2011 9:29 PM, jeremyee@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> List,
>     I just wanted to share some success with my upgraded coil with my new SRSG. It sure made a big difference though I still have work to do. I currently am only using the static gap recommended LTR capacitance on my 15 kV, 120 mA NST powered coil. Operating at 120 bps, the safety gap only fires occasionally. By tuning the phase using a Freau phase controller I can "switch" between 120 bps operation and 240 bps operation. It definitely gave a better output at 120 bps. Here are the videos:
>
> 120 bps hitting ladder, 4 ft arcs
>
> http://youtu.be/xYIN6S5Ai2k
>
> Varying between 120 bps and 240 bps with phase controller
>
> http://youtu.be/QjlH_u--P0o
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Jeremy
> Cincinnati
> Sent from my BlackBerry device from Cincinnati Bell Wireless
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla