RE: [TCML] Re: Interesting spark gap idea

["Phil Tuck (hvtesla)" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrew wrote>>" From my experience I would think the blowers would really
flight each other, producing a very inefficient design."

 

Thinking back I recall this was the reason why I favoured the vacuum as
well. I thought maybe two opposing jets could maybe create a 'dead spot'
where the air won't move? 

I used a smoke test (burning rag, nothing technical) on the suction method
but never tried with a blower

 

Regards

Phil

 

www.hvtesla.com

 

-----Original Message-----
From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Andrew Robinson
Sent: 18 February 2010 02:52
To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
Subject: [TCML] Re: Interesting spark gap idea

 

Norman

 

    Several here have done the exact reverse of this. Instead of two 

blowers, a vacuum is used. Its called a sucker gap. From my experience I 

would think the blowers would really flight each other, producing a very 

inefficient design.

 

Regards,

Andrew

_______________________________________________

Tesla mailing list

Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx

http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla