[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] more comments on the Hammer circuit



Hi,

I don't think you are seeing what Finn's circuit is doing. Let me try to make it more clear.

He needs a control signal to cross over zero to switch his IGBTs. He wants that to be perfectly matched to his primary coil drive current to prevent the usual explosions. So you just put a current transformer on the primary drive and you are all set!!

No... The IGBTs and circuits take say 1uS to switch. You are always going to be 1uS late... The age old zero crossing timing problem... :P

You could trigger the circuit at say 10% of the measured current level and make some messy circuit to switch 1uS earlier... You could put in A/D converters and signal processors... Nobody really does that. They just try to make that 1uS delay super smaller and hope it goes ok... It usually does fine :)

But there is a trick... I don't know if Finn, Richie, or everyone else figured it out first... ????

Put a small inductor in series with the current transformer's burden resistance. ELI Eli the Ice Man... The signal from the CT now leads the current!!!! That was way tooooo easy!! :) You can adjust the inductor (like 500nH) to get that 1uS delay just right or add a pot delay control like Finn did. Probably adjusting the coil is easier in practice ;) But Finn's circuit make the adjustment "beautiful" :)

The leading signal is independent of current solving a nasty "figure out 10% of the peak problem". It is just always right except at the very first as Finn reports. The control loop bandwidth is probably like 5MHz so it is not going to get lost like a PPL :D It can react to a current change extremely fast!! That is far faster and for more failure proof than any zero crossing "korector" I knew of before! *:)

Finn can even add dead time to the switching :))))))

It is purely brilliant!!!!! Who figure it out first anyway??? Are there any patent complications??? This is so important we had better figure out that "who's the daddy?" thing!! Amateurs don't need to worry, but folks like Finn would not want to get caught two years from now on coils they sold for money. God only know s how 'I' will use it >:D

Terry

BTW - The spikes have nothing to do with drive transformer winding and matching. Those are primary drive current high voltage noise spikes caused by trying to turn off the IGBTs at the wrong time while driving an inductance. It make a spark ;) My direct photo transistor drive does not have drive transformers, but I have those spike too ;) At least for the moment :D

It would be interesting to model this and study it here. But my time is short these days.... The RL burdan circuit could probably be more optimal...

Terry



DC Cox wrote:
Unless I missed something, in his paper, he does ask for comments and
criticism.

In the Hammer circuit he is contending he can produce phase shift.  In fact,
his adjustment only changes the amplitude of the signal, not the actual zero
crossing point of the signal.  If you watch the video you can see this.  The
gate drive overshoot is reduced, but the voltage-currtent phase is not
changing when the pot is adjusted, only the zero crossing point ---- and
this is valid for only one particular setting of current not thru the entire
range..

The gate drive overshoot is reduced, but this is valid only for one current
setting.  It may be set for a low current, medium current, or high current,
but not all values as the inductance is dynamically changing as the Q factor
(tied directly to inductance for those looking for equations) is dynamically
changing.

Any Tesla coil, RF air core inductor, under dynamic operating conditions
contains an AC resistance in parallel with a DC resistive component.  As the
coil heats slightly due to changing dI/dt, the dynamic operating Q of the
circuit changes.  If the dynamic Q is changing the inductance is also
dynamically changing.  Current and voltage do not reach zero at the same
time due to a phase shift.  You can correct phase shift for any particular
value of current, however this value is constantly changing during the ramp
up.  You would have to sit there and change the pot value all the time along
with the dynamically changing signal.

His adjustment circuit changes the amplitude not the phase shift of the
circuit.

If you want futher proof, do a nodal analysis on the circuit and you will
see exactly what I am talking about.

If you set the zero crossing value so there is zero current at switching,
and then try to also set this value for the point of maximum current, you
will fail --- at least with this method.  As the current is ramping up to
full value,
the IGBTs will overheat due to the phase shift problem.

I'm not just firing out blank comments here to serve no purpose ---- I do
have a solution that can be pursued.

Remember how B&W and color TV receivers always incorporate "delay lines" in
their construction to perfectly sync the signals?  This same technique could
be applied to solve this zero crossing problem. Delay lines, or,  a
microprocesser accurately tracking the signal could produce outputs that can
adjust phase shift just as is accomplished today in color TV receivers to
get everything in sync. TVs use delay lines not micros for this purpose.

Hammer definitely needs to adjust the gate drive transformer turns to reduce
the overshoot.  You can't get it perfect with near zero overshoot, but
certainly better than his scope signals indicate.

Hopefully, this will clear up some of the confusion on this issue.

Dr. Resonance
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla



_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla