[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [TCML] NST Measurements
Since the HV side of the NST was tied directly to the mains voltage, I have no reason to think that I should be loading that with a resistor, as the rest of my house is already doing that. Measured line voltage was 123.6V.
The voltage on the LV side of the NST without any resistive loading was 0.807V. With a 1K load resistor, it was 0.804V, and with a 510 Ohm resistor, 0.800V. So the predicted NST secondary voltage with a nominal 120VAC input varied between 18.4kV with no resistor on the LV winding, and 18.5kV with a 510 Ohm resistor (actually worse). Weird.
Regards, Gary Lau
MA, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of David Speck
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 9:40 AM
> To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [TCML] NST Measurements
>
> Guys,
>
> If you are using a modern high input impedance DVM for your
> measurements, you might try loading the winding you are measuring with
> something between 1K and 10K ohms, and see if your measurements make
> more sense.
>
> A couple of years back, I was trying to figure out the windings of a
> band saw blade welder transformer with a Fluke industrial DVM. It
> should have been a real simple job, but I wasted an entire day getting
> readings that were all over the place, unrepeatable, and totally
> inconsistent with the way I "knew" the transformer had to work.
>
> After I loaded the winding under test with a 1K power resistor, all the
> measurements made sense and were much more consistent. Might be an
> issue with these NST measurements as well.
>
> Dave
>
> mddeming@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi Gary, Bart, All,
> > ?
> > Back in Oct '07 I measured the Vin/Vout ratio forward and backward on a 15/30
> Transco NST using an old Triplett 630-Aanalog meter, which has a 6KVAC scale.
> The forward ratio was 124:1 at 48.4 Vin implying 14880 Vout at 120 Vin, but the
> reverse ratio was only 37:1 with 120 Vin on the secondary. These results are very
> inconsistant.?I will have to rerun it when I get a chance, but it seems to indicate that
> the reverse method doesn't work well for an NST
> > ?
> > Matt D.
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla