[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCML] Terry filters (speaker/motor load modeling)
In a message dated 1/2/08 9:27:33 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>It sounds like you have a far better understanding of motor theory than I
do (which truthfully is very
>little); perhaps you can point out where my reasoning leaves the tracks.
Thanks, Gary. I'm no expert by any means. I always enjoy your posts because
they cut right to the chase!
>My thinking is that in a loaded motor, the lion's share of the power
consumed is delivered to the
>mechanical load. In a simulation model, this power must leave the model,
and the only mechanism
>to do this is to burn off that power in a resistor to represent the
mechanical load. If the correct
>model for a motor is predominantly inductive as you suggest, I don't see
where the power delivered
>to the mechanical load is accounted for, as the power dissipated in an
inductor is zero.
OK, now I can see why that would be a problem for modeling purposes!
But resistance in the windings can't be the answer, either - a 20
horsepower AC induction motor can have a nominal efficiency of 95%, so most of the
energy isn't going into heat in the motor windings. One would guess a
superconducting motor would have only 5% better efficiency.
But that doesn't help with the model! FWIW, I think those nominal
efficiencies are supposed to be at 35% load (energy conservation legislation,
average loading of motors in industry per extensive research). Maybe a little more
or less at full load. But if it spins free with no load, it is doing *no*
mechanical work and its efficiency is zero! If it gets locked up, the rotor
doesn't turn, yet the currents go through the roof, it again does no work (the
rotor isn't moving), so the efficiency is zero.
>I agree that an unloaded motor is best modeled as inductive, but that
adding a load must add
I think you're right, to be accurate we need both inductive and
Here's what I just found:
Nice to see we were on the right track!
I guess the very simple version would be to say at no load it's
inductive, at full load it's resistive. If you need to model in-between, you'll have
to account for whatever load you put on it.
Center for the Advanced Study of Ballistic Improbabilities
**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
Tesla mailing list