Enough! Gary Peterson and William J. Beaty, kindly take a deep breath
of air rather than whatever it is that you're smoking, and spare us
the pseudo-science musings, hallucinations, and hero worship. This is
not welcome here.
> http://www.teslaradio.com/images/image014.gif
>
> Aha number two! And the labels in image014.gif above look
> accurate according to what I've figured out about this device.
>
> > The tower cupola is supported on electrically conducting legs,
>
> So it looks like my chain of speculation wasn't going down a dead end
> after all. The main terminal is shorted to ground, but done via
> low-value
> inductors.
Nonsense! Foremost, just because this was allegedly drawn by Tesla does
not mean it was drawn accurately, ever built, or ever worked. One can
patent anything regardless of whether it works or has any merit. I would
maintain that because it illustrates a spark gap between the secondary
and the top load, this attempts to illustrate some kind of HVDC generator
employing coronal rectification. But just because it was drawn does not
imply that it did or could work.
In any real-world Tesla coil, what do you think would happen if one
connected the topload to ground via an inductor of ANY realistic value?
The answer is NOTHING. Not for me, you, or even Mr Tesla. It would
short out any secondary resonance; this is elementary circuit analysis,
which apparently has no place in your analysis.
As to creating "Victorian spread-spectrum secure comm" and exciting
Earth-resonance frequencies - right. Could be he also planned to
transmit an encrypted version of the internet. I think we've wasted
enough bandwidth here. This thread makes a strong case for banning this
topic outright.
Gary Lau
MA, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of William Beaty
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:23 AM
> To: Gary Peterson
> Cc: Tesla Coil Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [TCML] RE: musing on lists ( Wireless Transmission Theory)
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Gary Peterson wrote:
>
> > http://www.teslaradio.com/images/image012-1.gif . This configuration
> > represents the initial Wardenclyffe design, but it could not be
> > implemented.
> > By the way, this is an earth-resonance transmitter.
>
> Aha! (That's "aha number one!") It does involve
> earth-resonance!
>
> > The initial Wardenclyffe design plan called for the installation
> > of two
> > 600-foot tall towers in relatively close proximity to each other.
> > The
> > two-tower idea could not be implemented due to financial constraints,
> > which
> > led to a series of modifications. The first of these led to the
> > arrangement
> > shown in a sketch dated May 29, 1901:
> > http://www.teslaradio.com/images/image014.gif
>
> Aha number two! And the labels in image014.gif above look
> accurate according to what I've figured out about this device.
>
>
> > The tower cupola is supported on electrically conducting legs,
>
> So it looks like my chain of speculation wasn't going down a dead end
> after all. The main terminal is shorted to ground, but done via
> low-value
> inductors.
>
> > Independent tuning the two sides of the circuit to
> > different frequencies (n/4 lambda, n being an uneven number) would
> > result in
> > the development of a higher order wave complex beyond the fundamental
> > resonant frequency of the extra coil. ("The transmitter was to emit
> > a
> > wave-complex of special characteristics. . . ." [MY INVENTIONS]; "
>
> Ooo, I hadn't seen that one before. If the two different frequencies
> are
> closely spaced, then the TC output will be AM modulated with a slow
> sine
> (a beat note between the two primary frequencies.) And so the voltage
> on
> the "C2" electrode will in sequence fall to zero and then rise to twice
> normal output, which fires the gap at the low frequency. That would
> *greatly* aid in quenching that arc. (I'd wondered why that arc would
> reliably quench between pulses, yet quenching seemed to be required.)
>
> And... WAVE COMPLEX. Aha number three. I don't often meet anyone who
> has the smallest idea about the meaning of Tesla's phrase "wave
> complex,"
> or whom even suspects that "wave complex" might be a key to some of
> Tesla's major (if undocumented) discoveries. If Tesla had earlier
> succeeded in creating "Victorian spread-spectrum secure comm," then
> this
> multi-resonant magnifier coil looks like an attempt to "encrypt" the
> Wardenclyffe power output so that only a desired receiver could
> benefit.
>
>
> I strongly suspect that much of Tesla's work was guided by a certain
> construction habit that modern hobbyists haven't reproduced: using
> huge
> primaries, large enough to stand inside. And then doing hands-on
> experiments with multiple secondaries while the primary was running.
> What do you get with two, three, five secondaries? What if they're
> all
> identical? What if they're all different by the same amount? By
> differing amounts?
>
>
> (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) )))))))))))))))))))
> William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
> billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
> EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
> Seattle, WA 206-762-3138 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla