[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] Skin effect

Hey Christopher...
I wouldnt ignore the nerve pathways entirely... they are designed to carry eletrical impluses..... 

Scot D


Christopher Karr wrote:


Hello, Matt,

I am looking for a worst-case scenario. The blood-vessels don't have to be carrying a large amount of blood, but they only need to be as conductive as they were when the meat was living. Since my family buys its beef from a fresh slaughter, it hasn't had much time to drain its blood. The blood, for the most part, is still in the meat.

I plan on letting the coil 'attack' the meat for long periods of time. I'm not looking for nerve damage. I'm looking for damage to the blood-vessels that may cause stiffening or pores.


To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [TCML] Skin effect
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:15:53 -0500
From: mddeming@xxxxxxx
CC: 
Hi Chris,


?


?A couple of things you may want to consider:


?


1) Does dead meat respond the same way (have the same electrical characteristics),?as living tissue with blood flowing through it, or does the high-iron-content blood itself become?a liquid?conductor?


?


2) Much of the reported damage (other than death and tiny puncture holes) is of long-term, progressive neurological dysfunction?from RF traveling over the myelin sheath of the nerves.?Neurological damage is much harder to detect by optical examination.







3) Biological specimens are anything but homogeneous conductors, a primary requirement of standard skin-effect theory. Meat without the skin may conduct differently than a hand with the skin still on.?


?


One of the more difficult problems of experiments is determining if what we are measuring really corresponds to what we want to know.


?


Good Luck,


?


Matt D.


?




?
-----Original Message-----

From: Christopher Karr <chriskarr4@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To: Tesla Pupman List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>

Sent: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 9:53 pm

Subject: [TCML] Skin effect





 Hello, everybody,    I've been reading up on the skin effect, and there's nothing that's very   conclusive on it. I have seen arguments that go either way, but no actual   studies. I'm in the process of testing this. If you'd like to read about my test   set-up, and, possibly, donate to the cause, you may go to my website at    http://www.teslasurplus.3000farad.com/donations/donations.htm    I am in need of a microscope and capacitors, as described on the page, and I was   wondering if anybody knew of a way to acquire said items. I haven't been able to   find any microscopes powerful enough for under $100 to test the burning of the   tissue.    I was wondering if anybody knew of any group that had tested the skin effect on   biological conductors.    The theory for the skin effect is simple, but it is hard to understand exactly   what forces are to blame. It's also difficult to determine what amperage is   enough to cause RF burns over extended periods.    _________________
________________________________________________ Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass. http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_anywhere_122008_______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla 
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla


_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_speed_122008_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla


_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla