[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: secondary frequency problem (fwd)

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: secondary frequency problem (fwd)
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:47:57 -0600 (MDT)
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <mod1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:47:58 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <8HSP42ZW6bK.A.1BE.ORH9GB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:04:39 -0700
From: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: secondary frequency problem (fwd)

As I mentioned, using DCR for Q is not accurate. But, sometimes 
measurement is needed to prove it."

	Also Q isn't that important since it is very low with streamer loading.  Good for bragging purposes - I've done that but still not very important.

Ed

Prev by Date: Re: Winding Lathe Construction (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: calculating copper plate indutance (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: secondary frequency problem (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: secondary frequency problem (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread