[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Secondary Internal Gaseous Insulation (fwd)

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Secondary Internal Gaseous Insulation (fwd)
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:04:38 -0600 (MDT)
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <mod1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:04:39 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <SdXWCljQ_WB.A.N_G.33n8GB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:11:38 -0500
From: Harold Weiss <hweiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Secondary Internal Gaseous Insulation (fwd)

Hi Chris,

Most of the time it's not much of a problem.  The biggest problem with SF6 
is that an arc will break it down to SF4 which is a really nasty superlethal 
byproduct.  Oil filled would be better and safer.

David E Weiss

> Hello,
>
> Has anyone ever tried preventing internal secondary arcing by filling
> the secondary with some sort of insulating gas, such as sulfur
> hexafluoride?  I think it would be fairly easy to do so, considering SF6
> would sink and could be sealed in the secondary with baffles.  I just
> can't find a good source for it.
>
> Chris

Prev by Date: Re: secondary frequency problem (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: secondary frequency problem (fwd)
Previous by thread: RE: Secondary Internal Gaseous Insulation (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: Secondary Internal Gaseous Insulation (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread