Re: Soljacic wins $10k MIT Young Scholar Award (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:21:08 EDT
From: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Soljacic wins $10k MIT Young Scholar Award (fwd)

 
In a message dated 8/31/07 11:23:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007  09:49:32 -0400
From: "Mccauley, Daniel H"  <daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list  <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Soljacic wins $10k MIT Young Scholar  Award (fwd)


Why is this so sad?
I'm not really up on the  technology being presented, but what evidence
is there to show this is  nonsense?

Thanks
Dan



Hi Dan,
 There is about 5 hours worth of reading on this in the List's  archives for 
the last 30 or so days.
The main complaint is that it is 100-year-old, highly  inefficient technology 
being presented and awarded, as a new,  high-efficiency breakthrough.
 
Matt D.



************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour