[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: audio oscillator (fwd)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:05:01 -0700
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>, tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: audio oscillator (fwd)

At 02:23 PM 6/29/2007, Tesla list wrote:

>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:25:30 -0700
>From: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: audio oscillator (fwd)
>
>It's hard to beat a nice Wien bridge for low distortion, but it
>doesn't have wide tuning range. "
>
>         Typically 10:1 frequency range which is usually "good 
> enough for government work".  That's what the HP oscillators did from day 1.


But not 3 decades like the Exar part...




>Ed