Re: Magnetic Pressure (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:50:08 +0000
From: stork3264@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Magnetic Pressure (fwd)

Hi Jared,

Comments intersperced,
 
> We can describe the magnetic energy of the inductor as:  Eb = 1/2  L Isqrd

True

> Conservation principles demand that the energy contained by the magnetic
> fields must be equal to the energy of the currents Ei within the inductor.
> Thus the total energy equals: Eb + Ei     Then:  Etotal = L Isqrd

No so.  Etotal = 1/2  L Isqrd as above.  Fields and particles are one and the same thing.  
You cannot double count them.  

Einstein said it is a delusion to think of the electrons and
the fields as two physically different , independent entities.  Since neither can exist 
without the other, there is only one reality to be described, which happens to have 
two different aspects; and the theory ought to recognize this from the start instead
of doing things twice.

Dirac also said fields and particles are not two different things.  They are two ways 
of describing the same thing -- two different points of view.

> We are describing waves of energy traveling at C down the entire length of
> wire in an inductor. Their must be a mass associated with this energy: E/
> Csqrd = M

Incorrect.

When describing waves of energy there is no need ( in fact, it's incorrect) to invoke 
masses at relativistic velocities to describe the wave nature of matter.  In 1923 DeBoglie
applied Einstein's 1905 postulate (W = hw) to the energy, W, of an electron wave, and 
identified momentum,p, of an electron.  Energy and frequency,w, are the same quantity.
Electrical momentum,p, is not related to Newtonian mass at relativistic velocities.

I have noticed you often try to cobble together different physical
equations in an attempt to produce other equations that the physical world
is supposed to adhere to.  Unfortunately this rarely works.  It's best to
test your theories with experiment and if successful then apply the
algebra to your data.

I do find your ideas about quantitization of magnetic fields in coils to
be quite interesting. Actually there is good experimental evidence of
macroscopic quantum behavior in certain coils.  I suspect it may be
related your findings.  Contact me off line and I will give you a citation
about quantum foundations of electromagnetism.

Regards,

RWW