Re: MIT wireless energy transfer 'breakthrough' now vaunted by Science News ... (fwd)

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:36:47 -0700
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>, tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: MIT wireless energy transfer 'breakthrough' now vaunted by 
    Science News ... (fwd)

At 07:38 PM 7/26/2007, Tesla list wrote:

>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:27:47 -0700
>From: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: MIT wireless energy transfer 'breakthrough' now vaunted 
>by Science
>     News ... (fwd)
>
>     I'm also an AAAS member for many years and was looking at the latest
>issue of Science after dinner and trying to figure out how to write a
>scathing letter in polite, objective terms.  Haven't gotten there yet
>because for some reason this thing really irritates me.  If I do write
>anything I'll send a copy here because it certainly is Tesla related.
>Might not hurt if someone else writes too.


I am in exactly the same position.  Every time I start revising, I 
get frustrated because it's just *so* lame.


>Ed