[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: Coil form material - Q-killer?*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:56:45 -0700*Delivered-to*: testla@xxxxxxxxxx*Delivered-to*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Old-return-path*: <tcmlmod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Resent-date*: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:56:36 -0700 (MST)*Resent-from*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Resent-message-id*: <6kGV4ZMq1fH.A._XH.UfEpFB@chip1>*Resent-sender*: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: "Gav D" <gdingley@xxxxxxxxx> Hi Ed, Jim, Mike thanks for that information, I will alter my PSpice simulation accordingly. Were either of you able to measure the Q directly, i.e. before breakout occurs during operation? I have attempted this by recording the waveform digitally and performing an FFT, but I think in the end I was just testing the effectiveness of the FFT! I should resort to more analogue methods, and suggestions/ideas? I retrieved a paper written by Wheeler on calculating skin-effect resistance, a methodology rather than a formula, i.e. it can be applied to any conductor geometry. All you actually do is take the formula for the inductance (e.g. the much used Wheeler formula for example), differentiate it by the direction in which the current will most predominantly flow (radius r in the case of the Wheeler inductance formula), divide by mu, and multiply by the skin-effect constant for that material at the particular frequency of operation. The results look OK, but I have not done any actual measurements to verify it. I will try and scan the Wheeler paper and find my copy of the Medhurst .zip file. Gavin On 1/9/07, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Original poster: Jim Lux <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> At 03:02 PM 1/8/2007, Tesla list wrote: >Original poster: "Gav D" <gdingley@xxxxxxxxx> > >Hi all, >I have been reading the Medhurst paper from which the much used coil >self-capacity formula originates and noticed a formula for dielectric >loss. Using this formula and calculating skin-effects, I have found >that the PVC pipe often used for winding a secondary contributes more >to reducing Q-factor than the conductor itself; I am correct? PVC isn't all that lossy at a few hundred kHz. There is a loading effect from the dielectric, but that just increases the parasitic C, lowering the self resonant frequency. I would imagine that resistive losses still dominate. >I would appreciate your comments, > >Regards, > >Gavin > > >

- Prev by Date:
**Re: an interesting mechanical engineering problem** - Next by Date:
**Re: Engineering Solution** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Coil form material - Q-killer?** - Next by thread:
**Re: Coil form material - Q-killer?** - Index(es):