[Original Message]
From: <FutureT@xxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/14/2007 2:29:09 PM
Subject: Re: [TCML] Form materials, losses, carbon tracking, sealing
 
In a message dated 12/14/2007 4:21:41 P.M. US Eastern Standard Time,  
btmeehan@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Thanks a lot for the info guys, that helps a lot - I heard someone  mention
using concrete forms.  If I remember, those were made of  very thick
cardboard?  Since I have heard several people talk  about it - I imagine that
it is reasonably resistant to lighting on  fire when it gets strikes?
I had been looking at a model rocketry  site that sells fiberglass forms, and
even does custom work.   Would I be better off with cheaper PVC or concrete
forms, or would the  lower loss tangent of fiberglass be worth something?
(granted, most of  the loss tangent numbers I have seen are in the MHz or GHz
region, so  kHz is probably not a problem with most materials)
(loss  tangents)
I would avoid those paper concrete forms.  Some of them have  strange
lossy materials in them.  Some are OK though.  Losses in PVC  are
not an issue for Tesla coils, but they are subject to carbon  tracking
when bad racing sparks or flashovers occur.  Probably the most  common
material used for secondary forms is PVC.  Heating and sealing the  PVC
is said to be beneficial but I never bothered with those  procedures.  
My TT-42, and TT-32 coils both use PVC forms.  
 
  _http://hometown.aol.com/futuret/page3.html_ 
(http://hometown.aol.com/futuret/page3.html) 
 
John
**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla