[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ganging Variacs (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 02:42:26 +0000
From: david baehr <dfb25@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ganging Variacs (fwd)
Why waste a nice Variac ?,...get a cheap variable shunt arc welder and
be done with it,
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Ganging Variacs (fwd)
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:23:45 -0600 (MDT)
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:08:58 -0700
>From: Barton B. Anderson <bartb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Ganging Variacs (fwd)
>
>Hi Terry, Tim,
>
>I did the same with my variac. I split the core to prevent
saturation.
>It's been a life saver for me since I only use a single
variac with my
>pig. But, if I had a large enough variac or two, I wouldn't
have done it
>(as it does ruin the variac for any other purpose). But if
it's solely a
>current limiting variac, cutting the core will help prevent
saturation
>issues, although I have smoked the brushes on this variac
from too much
>current. Even though saturation is prevented, current still
flows and
>the components that make up the variac can still be damaged
if high enough.
>
>BTW, remove the brushes at least once a year and inspect
them. Can
>prevent a bad situation. The smoked brushes occurred at my
2005 4th of
>July party. Funny, I just turned the current down and the
smoke went
>away. The coil kept on Rockin! The next weekend I did the
optopsy and
>found I was running on about 1/3 brush surface. I learned
from that
>experience to inspect brushes and replace when worn.
>
>Take care,
>Bart
>
>Tesla list wrote:
>
> >---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:46:40 -0500
> >From: Terry Oxandale <Toxandale@xxxxxxx>
> >To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: RE: Ganging Variacs (fwd)
> >
> >There has been a great deal of discussion on this issue as
well as the
> >parallel aspect. My experience was saturation of the
variac core, but
> >this is based upon the core size and voltage/turns ratio.
I don't have
> >the greatest understanding of this issue, but I believe it
is focused on
> >the fact that only a small portion of the core is used in
most of these
> >applications (reduce the number of turns reduces which
increases
> >current, but also increases the voltage/turns ratio to a
point of
> >saturation.
> >
> >I successfully split the core of my variacs (two 1256
variacs in
> >parallel) to prevent this from happening and have been
very happy with
> >the modulated current profile as compared to the nearly
uncontrolled
> >profile previous to splitting the core. It was a lot of
work though.
> >
> >Terry
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 7:12 AM
> >To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Ganging Variacs (fwd)
> >
> >
> >---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:48:34 -0400
> >From: timjroche@xxxxxxx
> >To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Ganging Variacs
> >
> >I understand about using paralleling chokes when using
variacs for
> >voltage
> >control, what about for ganged series variacs for current
control or
> >in-other-words, adjustable ballast?
>
>________________________________________________________________________
> >AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more
about what's free
> >from AOL at AOL.com.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________
Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place!