RE: once again...the correct schematic...

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: Yurtle Turtle <yurtle_t@xxxxxxxxx>

I don't get the 160 amp bypass. Mine's only rated for
50 amps at some duty cycle. Or are you talking about
160 amps on the "welding" side? Even so, mine doesn't
have any kind of bypass.

I'm not sure why they drew it this way. Seems more
complicated than necessary, but maybe they had space
limitations for their schematic. It's all on the same
core and has two welding leads.

I posted this last weekend. It's a little more clear
than Lincoln's, though I show my secondaries shorted.
You're technically correct regarding turns ratios, but
I chose to show mine like this, since there were so
many secondary taps, it would look ridiculous if I
were to show ten times as many (I think it's 240/24
volts or so) on the primary side.

http://www.hot-streamer.com/adam/garage/schematic_old.pdf

Adam


--- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Original poster: "Jim Mora" <jmora@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks Turtle,
>
> I'll save this Jewel. So, if I'm not too tired, we
> can ignore the reactor
> @160 and above amps. Are all three winding on the
> same core? Or separate? My
> Miller "infinite adjustment" was a little more
> simple. Is there a three wire
> output on the "s" version?. I have an old one with
> two.
>
> The main point here is that the primary is 3 times
> the windings or so and
> the secondary has mongo 1/3 windings to produce high
> current. Shorting the
> output above 160 amps bypasses the reactor and
> allows the most current to
> flow to the pig. So... Chips drawing is reversed,
> Yes?... though the
> resistor should stay with the flop.
>
> Thanks for the drawing,
> Jim Mora
>
> I am now using a dry pig with a slide reactor. A
> rocker switch moves a
> surplus satellite actuator. Much cleaner! And almost
> infinite adjustment
> again with no handles to crank.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 5:23 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: once again...the correct schematic...
>
> Original poster: Yurtle Turtle <yurtle_t@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Here's a Lincoln AC-225-S schematic:
>
>
http://www.hot-streamer.com/adam/bigass_coil/welder2.jpg
>
> Adam
>
> --- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   > Original poster: "Jim Mora" <jmora@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>   >
>   > PS. The buzz box doesn't look right. The primary
>   > (our series load
>   > inductance) has more turns than the secondary
> since
>   > it is a step down
>   > transformer. Someone please verify this note. I
>   > haven't taken my Lincoln
>   > apart to see where the taps are.
>   >
>   > Thanks
>   > Jim Mora
>   >
>   >
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
>   > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:09 AM
>   > To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>   > Subject: once again...the correct schematic...
>   >
>   > Original poster: "Chip Ford"
> <chipford@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   >
>   > Here is my 7th. revision to the schematic with
>   > the appropriate changes made to the choke
>   > setup...Thanks again to everyone..Chip...Ü
>   >
>   > http://hot-streamer.com/temp/Parallized6.JPG
>   >
>   >
>   >
>
>
>