RE: once again...the correct schematic...

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: <chipford@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you for your input. I am aware "now" that 
the reactor must be present in the welder to 
achieve the higher amperage. The welder drawing 
in my drawing is good enough to represent "a 
ballast" in the line. I have went in and made the 
primary show more turns then the secondary. 
Whether it is 3:1 ratio, I can't really say. I 
did edit the drawing though. I will consider 
changing the RSG to series and the Cap to 
parallel. Also, someone commented that the 
secondary leads from the welder should be 
shorted? This is an option? Correct? Maybe a real 
good idea for the first few runs even. But not 
100% a must...Thanks to everyone again...

---- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: "Jim Mora" <jmora@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks Turtle,
>
> I'll save this Jewel. So, if I'm not too tired, we can ignore the reactor
> @160 and above amps. Are all three winding on the same core? Or separate? My
> Miller "infinite adjustment" was a little more simple. Is there a three wire
> output on the "s" version?. I have an old one with two.
>
> The main point here is that the primary is 3 times the windings or so and
> the secondary has mongo 1/3 windings to produce high current. Shorting the
> output above 160 amps bypasses the reactor and allows the most current to
> flow to the pig. So... Chips drawing is reversed, Yes?... though the
> resistor should stay with the flop.
>
> Thanks for the drawing,
> Jim Mora
>
> I am now using a dry pig with a slide reactor. A rocker switch moves a
> surplus satellite actuator. Much cleaner! And almost infinite adjustment
> again with no handles to crank.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 5:23 PM
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: once again...the correct schematic...
>
> Original poster: Yurtle Turtle <yurtle_t@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Here's a Lincoln AC-225-S schematic:
>
> http://www.hot-streamer.com/adam/bigass_coil/welder2.jpg
>
> Adam
>
> --- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   > Original poster: "Jim Mora" <jmora@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>   >
>   > PS. The buzz box doesn't look right. The primary
>   > (our series load
>   > inductance) has more turns than the secondary since
>   > it is a step down
>   > transformer. Someone please verify this note. I
>   > haven't taken my Lincoln
>   > apart to see where the taps are.
>   >
>   > Thanks
>   > Jim Mora
>   >
>   >
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
>   > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:09 AM
>   > To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>   > Subject: once again...the correct schematic...
>   >
>   > Original poster: "Chip Ford" <chipford@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   >
>   > Here is my 7th. revision to the schematic with
>   > the appropriate changes made to the choke
>   > setup...Thanks again to everyone..Chip...Ã?
>   >
>   > http://hot-streamer.com/temp/Parallized6.JPG
>   >
>   >
>   >
>
>