[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: Racing Spark Prediction*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:38:14 -0600*Delivered-to*: testla@xxxxxxxxxx*Delivered-to*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Old-return-path*: <vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Resent-date*: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:24:01 -0600 (MDT)*Resent-from*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Resent-message-id*: <kZpE_JF3q0D.A.9-D.hj6XEB@chip1>*Resent-sender*: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: Paul Nicholson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Dimitry wrote: > [racing arcs] ...just measure it Why not? No progress has been made for a long time on understanding the mechanism behind racing arcs. Perhaps because the regular fix for the problem is generally successful there's little incentive. I posted a list of some possible causes, a while ago now, http://www.pupman.com/listarchives/2002/July/msg00429.html My hunch is that overtones have something to do with it, perhaps involving primary overtones too. That would explain the apparent sensitivity of the phenomena to small changes in tuning and coupling - or is that bit just a myth? Plus, I think there is more than one type of racing sparks, and I would be interested to hear coiler's descriptions. Dimitry wrote: > does this mean that i`m fooled every time when i see a nice, > almost linear 45 deg voltage rise from bottom to top of my > secondary, independently from what form of primary or value > of coupling i use? At any instant, the secondary voltage distribution is the sum of the primary induction and the secondary self induction, During much of the beat cycle, for modest k, the secondary self induction dominates and, given a nice big topload, the average secondary volts distribution will tend to give a fairly linear rise over the whole length of the coil. (Incidentally, the two dominant normal modes have pretty much the same distribution of I and V, diverging significantly only in the region in which primary induction is strong.) However, at times during the beat, for example the first quarter- cycle of the primary ringdown, the secondary must withstand the onslaught of the induction from the full primary current, and this has the distribution described by someone earlier - one which mimics closely the primary induction profile. The result might be very high transient volts per turn in those parts of the secondary receiving the strongest primary induction. A more uniform spread of primary coupling would mitigate this, but in a TC we're forced to apply the coupling more or less at one end. Looked at in the frequency domain, the greater concentration of coupling onto a small region of the secondary manifests as a larger overtone content - ie more of the bang energy goes into resonances other than the two which form the desired beat envelope. Overtone content is usually only a few percent at most, but each overtone has a peak-trough distance spanning rather fewer turns compared with the fundamental, so raising the volts/turn by the same factor. The recipe given by D.C. for avoiding racing arc problems by setting the primary plane some distance below the start of the secondary winding, is a sure fire way to make the coupling less concentrated, with of course an accompanying loss of k factor. Another effect of the close proximity of a primary winding to the bottom of the secondary is to apply greater shunt capacitance to that part of the coil, which results in a greater fraction of the overall secondary voltage rise in that region. A note about coupling: k is measured and defined in terms of low frequency, uniform current, conditions. But in operation, the secondary current distribution is not uniform so the effective coupling might be expected to be different from the low frequency value. This turns out to be the case when running distributed models - the ratio of the mode frequencies is a little different to sqrt(1+k)/sqrt(1-k), not that that matters in practice, it's just one of the many little factors that make the real coil differ slightly from the design model. The software library GeoTC http://www.abelian.demon.co.uk/tssp/geotc/ is capable of calculating the two contributions to secondary voltage - the self induced quarter wave profile, and the primary induced voltage profile, although I think this has not been fully implemented. Of course, such calculations won't by themselves predict whether a given design will suffer racing sparks. We'd have to figure out the mechanism(s) and the thresholds involved. To do more than speculate, we'd have to study closely the behaviour of a well-instrumented system which can be made to produce racing sparks. -- Paul Nicholson Manchester, UK. --

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Tesla Coil Questions (MOT Stack, Rotary, etc)** - Next by Date:
**Lots Of questions.** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Racing Spark Prediction** - Next by thread:
**Re: Racing Spark Prediction** - Index(es):