[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: watts vs VA Re: Primary- vs. secondary-current feedback
To
:
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: watts vs VA Re: Primary- vs. secondary-current feedback
From
: "Tesla list" <
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 08:45:30 -0700
Delivered-to
:
testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to
:
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path
: <
vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Resent-date
: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:47:41 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from
:
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id
: <
GmVXKrZNuEI.A._3.dAacFB@chip1
>
Resent-sender
:
tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "James Howells" <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for this posting it was probably the best explanation I have
seen ... I think I understand now
Prev by Date:
Tesla Archive: Lectures, Letters, Construction Techniques, Memorial, etc.
Next by Date:
Re: real life applications
Previous by thread:
Re: watts vs VA Re: Primary- vs. secondary-current feedback
Next by thread:
Re: Pressurized / gas-filled secondary? And an OBIT question.
Index(es):
Date
Thread