RE: Physics of Wireless Transmission

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "David Thomson" <dwt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Terry,

> > > This page explains it better than I can:
> > >
> > >
>
>http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/magnetic/magfield.htm
l
> >
> >The Hyperphysics page also explains the H and B fields as two
> >distinctly different manifestations of magnetism.  It is
clearly stated
> >in Maxwell's equation where B is equal to H times
permeability.  This
> >is like saying potential is equal to current times resistance.
We
> >don't say that current and potential are the same thing, or
even
> >similar.  The B and H fields are not the same thing, nor even
similar.
> >In fact, some authorities say the two units are orthogonal to
each
> >other.
>
> This seems to be an endless quiz where once one thing is
> explained, another question is presented...  I suggest you
> just look these items up on Google like I do...

I didn't present a question, and unless I misunderstood
something, the hyperphysics page agrees with my assertion that
the B and H fields are two completely different units applicable
to a magnetic field.  And it is very clear that the relativistic
charge equation gives the wrong label to the magnetic flux
density.

This is exactly the point I had tried to make in the first place.
The relativistic charge equations break the rules of physics just
so they can provide the answer that is wanted.

I was fair in admitting my shortcomings when they were pointed
out, all I'm asking from you is to acknowledge the shortcomings
of someone else's work now that I have pointed it out.

Dave