Original poster: "C. Sibley" <a37chevy@xxxxxxxxx>
What I'd like to do in a perfect word is build a gap,
with as many elements as practible, that would
technically be to wide to be safe, but be able to
adjust it down by shorting out one or more gaps.
Something like 7 elements at .05 each for a total of
.3"? I could short two elements out for a .25 gap, or
more if necessary.
I'm hoping to be able to copy what someone else has
been sucessful at (because of sheer lazyness :-)
Curt.
--- Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: "Lau, Gary" <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>
>
> It sounds like you have already heard the advice
> suggesting that it is
> necessary to experimentally set the gap so it just
> fires with only the
> NST connected, but are looking to save the 10
> minutes it would take to
> do that. A total gap width of 0.25" is a
> conservative figure for a 15kV
> power supply. You can use that, perhaps be
> disappointed in the
> performance, assume the gap width was too
> conservative and open it
> arbitrarily until the coil rocks. How long will it
> take to find another
> 15/120 NST?
>
> I personally prefer a single sucker gap using a
> vacuum cleaner motor to
> a multi-gap configuration. It's much easier to set
> the width, and you
> don't have to anticipate in advance how many
> segments and what
> separation you need. See
> http://www.laushaus.com/tesla/onegap.htm. But
> with a 15/120 power supply, you may wish to start
> thinking about using a
> sync RSG.
>
> Gary Lau
> MA, USA
>
> > Original poster: "C. Sibley" <a37chevy@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Getting ready to rebuild my copper tube gap, for
> use
> > with a 15KV 120mA NST. Does anyone have advice
> > regarding number of elements and gap between
> each?
> > I'm not feeling particularly excited about
> > experimenting, and would happily consider
> suggestions
> > for a good starting point...
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Curt.
> >
>
>