[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: DRSSTC, OLTC, OL-DRSSTC, M.I.C.,K.E.Y M.O.U.S.E. TC... Re: ALF: why not DRSSTC?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: DRSSTC, OLTC, OL-DRSSTC, M.I.C.,K.E.Y M.O.U.S.E. TC... Re: ALF: why not DRSSTC?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:28:17 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:28:00 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <pMnNDC.A.ouE.-fAPDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Have you measured your OLTC II (below the streamer
threshold breakout) in order to evaluate these
figures?
Below breakout, all of the energy is lost one way or another. I guess
the question is how much of it gets lost by the time of the first
output voltage peak.
Without an accurate way of measuring the output voltage, I can't say
for sure. But since it was capable of breaking out an 8" x 24" spun
toroid, I know the output voltage was around 560kV. The theoretical
output voltage with a primary capacitance of 14uF @ 1kV, and an
output capacitance of 32pF, is 660kV. So from conservation of energy
I can say it was around ((560/660)^2)*100 = 72% efficient.
I also measured the resistance of all the components in the primary
loop, and estimated the IGBT voltage drop. That suggested a total
energy loss in the primary circuit of around 0.6J per bang, which
would have made it 90% efficient.
So all I can say is that it was somewhere between 72% and 90% efficient :-/
Steve Conner
http://www.scopeboy.com/