[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 09:40:28 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 09:43:17 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <9JwOR.A.vAF.SWsNDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: FIFTYGUY@xxxxxxx
Original poster: "Gary Peterson" <mailto:gary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>gary@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Original poster:
<mailto:Sparktron01@xxxxxxxxxxx>>Terry>Sparktron01@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>Terry, ALL
>>Supporting Terry on this one. Richard Hull tried to detect fundamental
>>of Nemesis, max pickup distance was < 2 city blocks. Also had fellow
>>experimenter Bill Richards who is a lowfer HAM try to detect 54kHz
>>fundamental on opposite side of Richmond (~ 20 mi as crow flies)..
>>ZIP, ZERO, NADA. Nothing was detected above white noise level.
>>Regards
>>Dave Sharpe, TCBOR/HEAS
>>Chesterfield, VA. USA
>What did Richard and Bill use for their receivers?
I briefly asked Richard Hull about this yesterday. He simply said
they used a "Very Low Frequency" receiver - presumably they were looking
near Fres. He said there was *nothing detectable* past a mile from
Nemesis running at 13kW input.
OTOH, Dr. Resonance and others have been able to illuminate gas tubes
using a receiving coil of the same dimensions as the transmitter, at about
that same distance, running at about the same power. It doesn't take much oomph
to get a gas tube lit, but it would seem at least some tiny power is
detectable
that far away - if you're willing to have a big, super-sensitive receiver.
-Phil LaBudde