Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> This
> particular
> equation cannot meet the experiment, let alone
> confirm a magnetic
> field being produced by a varying electric field in
> a dielectric.
You're using a circular argument here. You started by
assuming that a magnetic field can't be produced by a
varying electric field in a dielectric, and you end up
asserting just what you assumed.
I'll restate my argument, which I don't think you have
done anything to disprove:
Power/energy can't be transmitted by either E or H
fields alone. It requires both to be present at once.
Therefore, if you see work of any kind being done on
an object in an electrical experiment, both E and H
fields must be present.
Therefore, moving charges around by mechanical means
in electrostatics experiments must generate H fields.
Granted, maybe a huge E and a tiny H, but the product
of E and H must still account for the power
transmitted.
I guess the corollary of that is that there must be an
E-field in the airgap of an ordinary induction motor
too, such that I can integrate the Poynting vector
over a control surface drawn around the rotor and get
an answer that accounts for the motor's mechanical
output. That is a little harder to believe :-/ But
since the H field is so strong, it would only take a
very small E field to make the math add up.