[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Maximum voltage of a toroid
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Maximum voltage of a toroid
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:51:35 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 18:49:57 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <Z94UID.A.4RH.1Y5GDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Derek Woodroffe" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Antonio,
Thanks for your response.
>The breakout voltage from a toroid is not identical to the breakout voltage
from a sphere, and is not also simply
>related to one or another of the two radii of curvature.
>A table listing breakdown voltages (kV) for several toroids with major
radius R and minor radius r:
>r/R 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450
>V/R 639.43 998.45 1261.10 1470.00 1644.57 1795.52 1929.30 2050.02 2160.33
>Note that for a thin toroid (r/R=0.05) the breakdown voltage is much larger
than the value for a sphere of
> radius r (0.05 x 3000 = 150), and that the value for the thickest possible
toroid is smaller than the value
> for a sphere with the major diameter (V/R = 2262.05 instead of 3000).
>Using the geometrical mean between r and R as the effective radius of an
equivalent sphere, reasonable values are found:
>r/R 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400 0.450
>V/R 670.82 948.68 1161.90 1341.64 1500.00 1643.17 1774.82 1897.37 2012.46
So from the above then (excuse my poor maths)
V(kv)=3*exp( ( log(R)+log(r) ) /2 ) where R & r are in mm, is a better
approximation?
Derek