[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New type of coil needs a name... OL-DRSSTC 7
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: New type of coil needs a name... OL-DRSSTC 7
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:55:04 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:55:28 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <oQD-0.A.i2C.vZSUDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
How about Fritzoformer?
I remember when Terry came up with the OLTC, there was a lot of talk
about calling it the "Fritz Generator". That got voted down last time
on the grounds that the OLTC was enough like a regular Tesla coil
that it didn't need a new namespace.
The OL-DRSSTC is even more radical though, so surely we should let
him have "Fritzformer" or Fritz Generator this time ;-)
Steve Conner
http://www.scopeboy.com/