[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: OL-DRSSTC 7 - It's Alive!
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: OL-DRSSTC 7 - It's Alive!
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:40:07 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:40:13 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <I2d8gD.A.HhC.bYPTDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >If so then switching as close to zero
> >current as possible is the way to stop this mode of
> failure.
That would be my only worry about the OL-DRSSTC. From
the data Terry has posted so far, it seems to have a
pretty long switching delay and ends up hard switching
a lot of amps.
I'll take the opportunity to plug my PLL driver that
can be set for zero or even less than zero switching
delay ;-) At the cost of having about 50 times more
parts than the OL-DRSSTC, of course :-(
Steve Conner
http://www.scopeboy.com/