[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Capacitor Size
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re[2]: Capacitor Size
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 22:45:54 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 22:46:19 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <3clXq.A.9jH.Y2fRDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Illicium Verum <sebas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Gary,
Thanks for pointing out. I to thought a static
sparkgap fired always at 120 BPS.
Is there a formula to calculate the BPS of a SSG?
I'm curious, what speed did you measure?
Best regards,
Sebas.
Thursday, October 6, 2005, 10:08:55 PM, you wrote:
> Original poster: "Lau, Gary" <<mailto:Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>
> Hi DC:
> I assume you meant to say "0.016 at 60 mA".
> Have you actually scoped a coil with a static gap
> that operates at 120 BPS? Every static gap coil
> that I've scoped ran at a far higher rate than
> that. I probably could have achieved 120
> (chaotic average) BPS, but I would have had to
> open the gap to an unsafe setting. Since I tend
> to use a 2X mains-resonant cap size, I would see
> an even higher BPS had I used a 1.57X cap.
> In my early naïve days of coiling I thought that
> 120 BPS was the natural and normal mode of
> operation for a static gap. I know better now
> and don't wish to perpetuate that misunderstanding.
> Regards, Gary Lau
> MA, USA
>> Original poster: "D.C. Cox"
<<mailto:resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Erms resonant value times 1.57 for best effective C value. With 30
>> mA its near .008 and doubles to 0.16 at 60 mA. This works best with
>> a static copper tube sparkgap firing 120 pps.
>> Dr. Resonance
>> >Original poster: "Lau, Gary" <<mailto:Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>
>> >
>> >The mains-resonant cap value for a 15/30 NST with 60 Hz power is
>> >.0053uF. It was once thought that this would hit a performance
>> >sweet-spot, but I don't think this is so. Non-linear behavior
>> >(ferroresonance) of the NST core makes the mains-resonant cap value a
>> >moving target.
>> >
>> >The rage these days is to use a Larger Than (mains) Resonant cap value.
>> >The calculated mains-resonant value multiplied by the square root of 2
>> >(or was it 3?) is often cited as the optimum value. Personally, I've
>> >found that 2X the mains-resonant value works well. I doubt there's any
>> >kind of sharp sweet spot, so any of these factors will all work.
>> >
>> >One thing that is clear is that streamer length is proportional to bang
>> >size. So if your static gap fixes the bang voltage, you can get a
>> >bigger bang and longer streamers at a reduced bang interval by using a
>> >bigger cap. But if your wife favors your existing cap, you might get a
>> >bigger ba... OK, I'll stop there. Always a compromise...
>> >
>> >Regards, Gary Lau
>> >MA, USA
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Original poster: "Dirk Stubbs"
<<mailto:dirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>dirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > >
>> > > I have a question about sizing of a capacitor. My power supply is a
>> > > NST 15kV at 30mA. I originally planned on using 10 doorknob
>> > > capacitors which are rated at 30kV with 0.006 uF total(each was 620
>> > > pF). However I have a question about the needed capacitance for my
>> > > TC. Most of the references such as websites and calculators said
>> > > that I need .0053 but I see people saying you need .008-.009 uF.
>> > >
>> > > What size is correct?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > What will happen if I use my current capacitor setup?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I would like to use my current setup to save money. The wife has
>> > > about had it with the TC as it is . J
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Dirk
>> > >
>> > > -
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
--
Best regards,
Sebastiaan