[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla Receiver Coil
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla Receiver Coil
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:07:31 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- In-reply-to: <5b.72f4b6e3.3074bfa5@aol.com>
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- References: <5b.72f4b6e3.3074bfa5@aol.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 00:05:26 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <NmNK9D.A.yxC.m02QDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Terry Fritz <vardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
But, We really "appreciate" those that still try with "real
hardware" and "real results" :-)))
Cheers,
Terry
At 11:33 PM 10/4/2005, you wrote:
Hi Mark,
Almost everyone has done some variation of this at some early
time in their coiling lives. After a while, those who do the math
realize that it's about as efficient as using an industrial laser
as a cigarette lighter. If you check the list archives, you will
find hundreds of hours of reading on so-called wireless energy
transmission. If you are close to an AM broadcasting tower, you can
run a tiny motor off of a crystal radio, but the efficiency really sucks.
Matt D.