[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla Coil RF Transmitter
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:42:47 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:48:18 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <sep4P.A.gjE.AsYQDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Gary Peterson" <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Original poster: "Chuck Hobson" <g0mdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Original poster: "Dan" <DUllfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
. . . end of a tesla coil? answer: the ground plate! Tesla was
transmitting energy by pumping a charge into the ground itself. .
. . he was trying to keep RF losses to a minimum. He would
usually say that his coils dissipated about 10% energy in RF, and
90% energy through the ground. . . . The coil, all by itself,
without an antenna, will transmit if it is properly grounded.
Dan
That's true about a properly grounded Tesla Coil Dan, but the
Effective Radiated Power (ERP) would still be miniscule, probably
undetectable (electromagnetic waves) beyond about 500 to 1000m
distance I would think. It would be interesting to know if anyone
has tried detecting Tesla Coil signals with a good communications receiver.
Chuck
There is no way his configuration could have behaved other than as a
transmitter with a short top-loaded antenna. The circuit is clearly
shown over and over again in his patents. I'll agree that the
radiated power would have been low because it's a lousy design for
transmitting but that's all it could do. . . .
Ed
I think we can all agree that a grounded Tesla coil without a
Marconi-type antenna is a poor source of radio waves, i.e.,
electromagnetic waves that have closed back upon themselves and are
no longer associated with the antenna.
In my mind the questions to be answered are these:
1) Is a well-grounded non-sparking toploaded Tesla coil operated in a
CW mode at, say, 35 kHz capable of producing locally a periodic
disturbance in the earth's electrical charge?
2) If so, at what distance from the TC transmitter can the electrical
disturbance be detected using a receiving transformer of similar size?
3) If the disturbance can be detected at a multiple wavelength
distance from the launching structure, does this distance increase
with an increase in transmitter power?
4) If the transmission-reception distance does, in fact, increase
with an increase in transmitter power, what is the mathematical
relationship between the two?
Gary