[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC Resistance of wires - was 8 kHz Tesla Coil
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: AC Resistance of wires - was 8 kHz Tesla Coil
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:13:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:12:00 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <XVroXB.A.foH.3DDQDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The work that Dr Gary Johnson did for AC resistance seems to solve
the Rac/Rdc problem for round wires (no proximitry effects).
>...
The following table shows
this for wr/sd up to 8.
wr/sd Rac/Rdc
------------------
1 1.020
2 1.263
3 1.763
4 2.261
5 2.743
6 3.221
7 3.693
8 4.154
A simpler calculation, assuming that all the current is concentrated in
a ring with thickness equal to the skin depth and external radius equal
to the wire radius, results in:
Rac/Rdc = (wr/sd)^2/(2wr/sd-1)
The table above becomes:
wr/sd Rac/Rdc difference
1 1.000 -2.0%
2 1.333 +5.5%
3 1.800 +2.1%
4 2.286 +1.1%
5 2.778 +1.3%
6 3.273 +1.6%
7 3.769 +2.1%
8 4.267 +2.7%
The error is negligible in comparison with the more exact formula. So,
the basic skin depth formula can be used with round conductors quite
well.
Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz