RE: FW: Warning on DRSSTC's

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Hooper, Christopher AZ" <christopher.az.hooper@xxxxxxxxx>

Good day great coilers out there,

I am so sorry that I did not clarify on my wording and will be vigilant
in the future so there is no confusion. The word "Nasty" here in the
stinking desert is a good word, such as: that is one Nasty motor in that
boat. Since I collect radioactive rock (rare earth), that is one Nasty
rock you got there buddy or that is one Nasty gun you got there sir. So
when I mean DRSSTC's are "Nasty", Nasty in my book is a good thing.
Sorry for the perplexity of Nasty and will ensure I observe my phrasing
on future input to this great list!


Rgs,
christopher

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:50 PM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FW: Warning on DRSSTC's

Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>

On 11/29/05, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 >
 >  > DRSSTC's are nasty machines
 >
 > Mine isn't, as far as I can tell.

My coils are just fine until they strike the house (or any of its
conduit).  This causes the cable internet to reset.  Once my large
coil threw out a 7 foot power arc to the house, it wiped out the
network card on a computer that was at the opposite end of the house.
That is the extent of the damage, not a big deal because we had some
spare cards, just dont let it happen again.

Steve Ward