[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Safety gap issues

To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Safety gap issues
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:29:16 -0700
Delivered-to: testla@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Old-return-path: <vardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:27:00 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <J51i3sb171I.A.QiB.EFriDB@chip1>
Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx

Hi JT,

In a message dated 11/27/05 8:38:35 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

Original poster: "JT Bowles" <jasotb@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>Whoa, whoa, whoa. People, which is it?

>*Vo = Vgap x SQRT(Cp/Cs)

Theoretical lossless system's upper limit.


           OR
>*Vo = Vgap x SQRT(Cp/2Cs)



Practical limit for real coils.

Ewe gutter reed the rhea sponsors kare filly, ant learner spelt guud. ;-))

Matt D.

Prev by Date: FANTC, JAVATC, JAVAMMC download PC versions
Next by Date: Re: series or parallel???
Previous by thread: Re: Safety gap issues
Next by thread: Re: Safety gap issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread