[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LTR vs. STR for pigs was Re: PFC Question
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: LTR vs. STR for pigs was Re: PFC Question
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:03:12 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:04:11 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <5Pu81.A.P1G.YS3eDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Dmitry,
On 15 Nov 2005, at 17:38, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > I realized after sending the message above that Dmitry's attempt to
> > equate E x BPS with the 1.7 factor was flawed - that factor applies
> > to *wallplug draw*
>
> you wanna say, that for example, in my future coil these values would
> differ in several times? :-))) it`s just impossible. Zprimary of my
> coil - about 25 Ohm, Rsg is going to be not more than 1 Ohm, full
> transfer - 3 cycles, then if we`ll assume that _each_ cycle i lose 4%
> (it`s far away from that really), then during the transfer time i`ll
> lose 12% maximum. so as i said - W ~ E x BPS.
You may end up being as surprised as I was when you actually try it.
Malcolm