[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thinking About A Geiger Counter



Original poster: Blake Hartley <teslaspud@xxxxxxxxx>

Makes sense. The geigner counter is a better idea, i was just thinking that he had already been there for quite some time, so waiting for the paper to develope would be that much of a problem.

Blake

On 11/12/05, Tesla list <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Original poster: "Dave Halliday" <<mailto:dh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>dh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This would work but there are several issues.

The paper is not very sensitive.

There is a time lag between the exposure and developing it -- if your
Geiger Counter starts going nuts, you hit the power switch or get the
hell out of the area.

With the paper, you will have the appreciation of knowing that you
absorbed a significant hit of radiation and can do nothing about it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 8:07 PM
> To: <mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Thinking About A Geiger Counter
>
>
> Original poster: Blake Hartley <<mailto:teslaspud@xxxxxxxxx>teslaspud@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> "Any thoughts would be great." How about the paper stuff that is used
> in taking x-rays of people? It would change color in the presence of
> x-rays, or at least that is what i would think.
>
> Blake
>
> On 11/7/05, Tesla list
> <<mailto: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx><mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: "Bob (R.A.) Jones"
> <<mailto: a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi,
>
> > Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <<mailto: m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> snip.
> > >
> > > I very well know that high voltages striking objects is
> something that
> > > creates X-RAYS. My intended meaning is that Geiger
> counters count
> > > particles, not x-rays or other radiated energy.
> > >
> > > Skip
> >
> > Sorry, not true. They detect gamma rays with ease. In fact
> the clicks
> > you get from background radiation are mostly if not all,
> gamma rays.
> > When I built mine, the first measurements I took were of gamma rays
> > leaking out of a supposedly radiation proof locker with some Cs-137
> > samples inside.
> >
> > Malcolm
> >
> snip
>
> More specifically Geiger counters detect ionizing particles/radiation
> (photons i.e. UV light x-rays gamma rays) that have
> sufficient penetrating
> power to get in to the tube and ionize the gas it contains.
> They can probably detect neutral particles too via nuclear
> reactions which
> create ionizing particles/radiation but with a very very little
> (negligible) efficiency.
>
> As has already been pointed out x-rays are generated when
> electrons, of
> sufficient velocity strike not only a solid object but a gas
> or for that
> matter a liquid.
>
>
> R A Jones
>
>
>
>
>
>
>