[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PFC Question
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PFC Question
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:27:01 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:28:01 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <w-01M.A.LuG.vQjdDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > What is needed here is to measure the phase
>> > of the variac output wrt the phase of the input of the variac to put
>> > things into perspective.
>>
>>i guess it`s bad idea - phase shift would depend from the load size
>>and its character - at the same variac.
> Bad idea???? Not if leakage inductance is insignificant as was
> suggested.
this idea is bad independently from the leakage inductance value,
coz by such way we obtain the answer only in a specific situation -
at the specific conditions. but i`m offering to get something more
common, because the leakage inductance is the property of the given
variac and by knowing this value we can calculate the phase shift for
_any_ arbitrary load in any arbitrary situation.
and, by the way - i`ve no nst and i`m indifferent to how the variac
influence it - i`ll never use nst in my psu :-D
but variacs - always ;-)
-----
The solution to no primary hits lay in getting rid of the primary!
This is no joke either.
20-06-96 (c) Richard Hull, TCBOR