[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: option 1 or option 2.....
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: option 1 or option 2.....
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:02:59 -0700
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:03:31 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <0erU2B.A.HRG.mdAcDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Kidd6488@xxxxxxx
the voltage for the MMC is 3kv * 8 caps = 24000... you do not divide
by the # of strings.... it is for the capacitors in series...
parallel doesn't change the voltage rating.
Jonathon
----------------
You said:
p.s. why is the voltage of the entire MMC (3KV * 8 = 24000 / 5
strings = 4800V??) only 4800 volts when the peak voltage of the xfrm
is 14140V?
thanks