[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: center tapped transformers
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: center tapped transformers
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:41:10 -0700
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:42:15 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <ag1LK.A.2xH.I_iaDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Qndre Qndre" <qndre_encrypt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
John,
I'm not talking about grounding one end of the secondary but about
not grounding anything on the secondary side. This way I don't see
why there should be a voltage potential between the transformer's
secondary and the transformer's primary where insulation could break
down. If the secondary is held seperate from the primary the circuits
are fully galvanically seperated.
Q
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: center tapped transformers
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:34:12 -0700
Original poster: FutureT@xxxxxxx
In a message dated 11/2/05 4:22:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
Q,
The secondary insulation of NST's and OBIT's cannot withstand
the voltage stress of what you're suggesting.
John