[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No Terry filter
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: No Terry filter
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 11:12:15 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 1 May 2005 11:12:26 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <QWK3lB.A.paB.x3QdCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "david baehr" <dfb25@xxxxxxxxxxx>
...Static gaps destroying neons ?? ,Hmmmm....
>From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: No Terry filter
>Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 10:49:09 -0600
>
>Original poster: FutureT@xxxxxxx
>
>In a message dated 4/30/05 11:36:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>
>>Original poster: "david baehr" <dfb25@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>I have never used any protection between neons and the
>>coil,...other than
>>maybe a safty gap, with only a couple of failures over many
>>years,(static
>>gaps
>>there
The static gaps were prone to destroying the NST's despite
>shorter output spark lengths.
>
>John
>
>