[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: big coil history
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: big coil history
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:27:09 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:27:33 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <QBEJS.A.MmH.l-LTCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Maybe it's the quarter wave transmission line transformer thing?
Could it be Ferranti for spelling? (there's a well known Italian HV company
of that name)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: big coil history
> Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> The 1/4 lamda myth was strongly advocated and propagated by a number of
> Physics textbooks many of which referred to it as "the Ferrenti
Effect" ---
> must be something Italian.
>
> Dr. Resonance
>
>
>
> > Take a nice lumped theory Tesla coil model like this:
> >
> > http://www.hot-streamer.com/TeslaCoils/MyPapers/modact/Image160.gif
> >
> > And try and work through it with pencil and paper ;-))
> >
> > Today with computers and MicroSim like programs, "anyone" can do it!!
But
> > if one tries to do it the hard way (and many many have tried!!), you
just
> > can't do it.... Much like transmission line theory in 80's, the tools
> were
> > not there to workout the details.... Today, Antonio has many papers
where
> > those details "have" been worked to a very high degree!
> >
> > Also, today we can measure things with high confidence. In the 30's and
> > 40's, they just did not have the test tools to "know" what was going
> > on. It is always far easier to know what the system is doing with real
> > measurements and "then" fit the theory ;-))
> >
> > In the old days I am sure many worked things and found the terminal
> voltage
> > of a coil with say 10 foot streamers to be 300kV... Well, that was
> > obviously "wrong" !! :o)) 10 feet at 10kV/inch is 1,200,000
> > volts... Tesla always gave coils super high voltages too... If the
> > physics did not agree with Tesla then the physics was obviously wrong
> > because Tesla certainly was not... I think a lot of the mess got
started
> > just that way...
> >
> > Of course, we all know who started the 1/4 wavelength of wire idea
;-)))
> >
> > http://www.pbs.org/tesla/tt/images/tt_main.jpg
> >
> > "Probably through misinterpretation of something Tesla said?"
Actually,
> > direct and accurate interpretations of what Tesla said...
> >
> > If he would have had a good scope, think of how different it would all
be
> > now!!!! If anyone gets that time machine working, we gotta send Tesla
a
> > scope!!! If Tesla had a scope, maybe we would have time machines now!!
> ;o))
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Terry
> >
> >
> > At 01:02 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote:
> > >"Given that folks in the 30s and 40s were using the lumped LC analysis
> > >approach (and it had certainly been around before that), it would be
> > >interesting to see where, when, and why, the 1/4 wavelength of wire
idea
> > >started to be used."
> > >
> > > Probably through misinterpretation of something Tesla said?
> > >
> > >Ed
> >
> >
> >
>
>