[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DC-> AC Power Switching
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: DC-> AC Power Switching
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:06:30 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:07:03 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <clFlUD.A.uWF.VfhSCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Davetracer@xxxxxxx
Hi,
My old battle ground.... Might want to reply to Dave directly ;-))
-------------------------
There's been a lot of discussion of some heavy duty power switching
here on the list, particularly between AC and DC supplies, and, well, I am
just out of my depth on a science project my son has suggested. Can I
present it and just ask for comments? It's quite obvious that the EE stuff
I learned in 1976 has either faded from my brain or been overtaken ... I'm
quite aware that this may be a stupid question, and am willing to take the
heat for that, but it might also prove to be a fun question. If it can't
work, I'd love to know *why* for the knowledge of it. I am in the oh-so-fun
position of being The Dad Who Does Not Know The Answer, and since I have a
scope for my computer stuff and build computers, he thinks I know All about
electricity, which I just plain don't.
I'm going to ask (beg, bribe, plead) the moderator to allow this note
on the TC list in the hopes of finding someone who can tell me if his idea
might work.
His idea, which I find interesting, is to store power. Charge the
batteries during the night, when the electrical networks around the country
are pretty unloaded, then release it during the day, especially at peak (4
PM, according to the California ISO people anyway). He's done some pretty
interesting research that shows that areas like California have the
generating capacity but their timing is wrong; if they could store some
power at night, they'd do okay during the day. (Yes, I'm aware this is in
thousands of megawatts.)
He also found that in Colorado, we have done that, by pumping water
from one lake upstream to another at night, and letting it flow down during
the day. This explains a lot of what I've seen on Guanella Pass.
One reason TO do this thing is the politics at his school. They're
having a "green" year and the science projects are supposed to be about,
well, ecological stuff, solar power, whatever. Personally I'd prefer to
blow something up or bounce a laser off the Moon or something fun, but you
know how it goes.
He proposes using "cheap tech" to solve this -- lead acid batteries.
Are lead-acid batteries efficient enough to even bother? This is an answer
I am having a curiously hard time finding an answer to ... what percentage
of energy going in comes back out? I don't propose to abuse the batteries
(deep drain them or chill them).
Here's the idea. Take 10 lead acid batteries (basically car
batteries). Connect them through a relay network (note, relays just for
safety, semiconductors don't bother me) so they can be in one of two modes:
Either being charged at 12V each with a trickle charger, or connected in
series to form (up to) 120 VDC. [Guess I could charge the group at 120VDC
but I've been told that is bad.]
(Yes, ideally, the chargers should be set to a precise voltage in the
12.x region and so forth, taper the charging, and so forth. That'll be for
the government version).
Inverters are expensive and the transformers and sheer iron are
terribly expensive. Again, "cheap tech". He came up with the idea of
patterning a sine wave, from 0 to 120 volts and on down to 0, by connecting
an increasing number of batteries in series with medium speed, computer
driven, semiconductor switches (probably transistors). I mean, at 60 times
per sec, I don't think relays are going to keep up, but probably someone
will mention how wrong I am (grin).
Thus at (+)0, nothing is connected; at the first point in the sine
wave, as it approaches +12, the first battery connects, as it approaches
+24, the second battery connects, and so forth, up to 120V, then back
down. Yes, I know a true AC sine wave goes up past 120V, but this is more
of a "does this approach stand a chance" versus "nailing it on the dot"
question. We'll definitely be outputting sinewave data much faster than Mr.
Nyquist requires; 60 Hz is not a big challenge to even a slow 8 bit
microprocessor.
This will give us modulated 0 to plus 120 VDC. You can see where I'm
going, right? Now one idea is to simply switch poles so we're now working
with (-120) to 0 VDC. If that proves impossible, maybe going for another 10
batteries, to form a negative 120 rail. Note: I don't propose to buy 20
car batteries for a science project no matter how nice my son is about it.
We'll use small 12V lead-acid ones.
So, we're at an idea of running a -120 volt rail and a +120 volt rail,
and using semiconductors to switch the voltage to match a normal AC sine
wave. (As you can see, this is a clumsy way of doing modulation with an
additive voltage ladder). Without an inductor or a capacitor to smooth
things down, it's going to stair-step. Adding those is possible. Adding a
6V or even 3V battery to get very smooth is also possible.
I do see that going from 120V sources and doing PWM would also work,
but I have deep concerns about matching the current and voltage needs,
especially as they change with a load, "on the fly" with PWM.
I believe I can handle the DAC stuff to measure the current and match
phase to an outside AC source (although of course I'd have to chat with the
power company about that; probably just showing it would work would be
sufficient).
Now I could probably model this system with relays and run it at 10
hz. But I am not comfortable using transistors at this voltage and power
level [not to mention buying all this stuff!] without asking someone if
this has a prayer of working. Believe me, I have made my share of
expensive smoke clouds just with computer stuff! I did a search on the Net
for this sort of stuff and found a grad student over in Taiwan made AC with
PWM, and it sounds like he worked his tail off. I found nothing else!
I don't know much past what'll happen when the 60 hz cycle is working
and the 'scope says it matches. Bring it out to an outlet? Isolation
transformer? To be a good project it should generate a good current. "The
Battery Page" has taught us a lot. I'd like to be able to steadily generate
AC at 20A and peak to 40A or so, because there are going to be spikes (see
also: inductive loads, turning something on, etc). The spikes worry me a
lot, because I don't want evils like ringing and undershoot to hit the
transistors and kill them. And I am totally out of my depth answering a
question like, "What impedance do I match to", because matching that is
what prevents said ringing. I clearly need to talk to someone who knows
power engineering; hence this note.
For example, if an inductive load like a vacuum cleaner powers up,
there is going to be an initial heavy draw (if I remember EE correctly,
theoretically infinite at start). I have dreams of expensive power
transistors letting the smoke that makes them work out at that point. When
it powers off, I believe there's going to be a voltage spike as an inductor
turns off. (See also: smoke coming out). Things like this worry me. An
isolation transformer is looking really much better.
The only thing I've seen online that can handle around 40A are some
power transistors. I haven't seen anything in SCR land that can. The other
thing about SCR's that bothers me is the heat they generate handling even
small loads.
Anyway, there you go. With the "green" teachings his school has [sigh]
, if this project can be made to work, he'd probably do pretty well on the
science fair side. If it's a nitwit idea, mea culpa -- he is 16. If it
needs tweaking but is possible, that would be nice too. I wish I knew more
on this but I just plain don't, so I'm asking some people who would know.
Many thanks,
Dave Small
p.s. Feel free to email me direct at
<mailto:davetracer@xxxxxxx>davetracer@xxxxxxx to avoid cluttering up the
mailing list, probably unless you think your answer is also relevant to
something like running a DC powered Tesla Coil ...
p.p.s. I think trying to do 3-phase is probably not a good idea. *grin*
p.p.p.s. "1.21 Gigawatts! Tom, what am I going to do!!??" -- Back To The Future