[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: LC derivation II*From*: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:29:47 -0700*Delivered-to*: testla@pupman.com*Delivered-to*: tesla@pupman.com*In-reply-to*: <22071782203644.22036442207178@emich.edu>*Old-return-path*: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>*References*: <22071782203644.22036442207178@emich.edu>*Resent-date*: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:29:49 -0700 (MST)*Resent-from*: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx*Resent-message-id*: <ULrC-C.A.YgE.9ngQCB@poodle>*Resent-sender*: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx

Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

At 12:48 AM 3/23/2005, you wrote:

Taking:

L = u Nsqrd Area / l

A far better and more accurate formula is the Wheeler equation:

http://home.earthlink.net/~jimlux/hv/wheeler.htm

Accurate to a percent...

Substituting: r/2l x Surface area solenoid = Area

Assuming spherical capacitor for the top end:

Capacitance = surface area sphere x e/R

There are theoretically "Perfect" programs out there now that do toroids and such!!

http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq/programs/

Placing both of these into:

Freq. = 1 / 2 pi sqrt(LC)

No... The secondary coil itself stands in space and has an associated capacitance as well generally known as the Medhurst capacitance.

http://home.earthlink.net/~jimlux/hv/medhurst.htm

http://www.abelian.demon.co.uk/tssp/misc.html

See note far below:

http://hot-streamer.com/TeslaCoils/Programs/Programs.htm

Removing u and e from the radical as C

Placing an r in the numerator of the radical and pulling an r out of the radicals denominator. Gives us:

Frequency = C/ wire length x sqrt ( [2 (l sqrd) R r] / [ (Sa sphere x Sa solenoid)] )

Again the units of 1/s come from the velocity of light divided by the wire length. The rest of the expression has no units and can be thought of as a scaling factor.

We have been told numerous times that we have a pathological fixation on wire length. Hmmmm, is that so?

:-) It was popular to find the wire length as the quarter wave frequency

Lwire = C / (4 x Fo)

http://hot-streamer.com/temp/pn2511.pdf

E-Tesla note: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ tesla@xxxxxxxxxx Terry Fritz <twf@xxxxxxxxxxx> New Fo, Cself, Ctotal Program 1/3/99 01:17pM

Hi All,

and total capacitance of our secondary coils before they are built. Wheeler's

formula gives us the secondary inductance to a very good accuracy so calculating

the inductance of the secondary has never been a real problem. The Medhurst

equation supplies us with a number for the secondary self capacitance that is

fairly accurate. However, once you put a terminal on the top of the secondary,

things get bad. The terminal is placed within the self capacitance space and

has the effect of adding to the self capacitance. There are rules and ideas

about how to guess at this situation but guesses are all there are. People have

done experiments but the experimental set up never seems to match our systems

well and the results may not be very good. You won't find a good single equation

for this situation.

systems by calculation rather than building it and seeing how close we guessed.

If one thinks about all the variables the problem quickly seems impossible.

Coulombs on the object divide by the voltage. If we know the charge and the

voltage we know the capacitance (and Fo). The voltage is really easy. It can

be any arbitrary voltage ( I use 100 volts... for no real reason). Then the

problem is simply to find the charge, on the coil system, at that voltage. Sounds

hard to figure out and the mental effort behind the solution is in the realm of

genius. Fortunately, around 200 years ago Karl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855)

figured it out for us. It doesn't mater how complex or messy the dimensions of

the charged object are. All that matters is what the field around it looks like.

Gauss came up with what is known as Guass's Relation. It is:

"The total flux passing outward through any closed surface equals (1/eo) times the total electric charge inside the closed surface."

In other words, if you throw any shaped charged object into a bag with lots of little electric flux sensors sewn into it. The charge on the object will be equal to the sum of what all the sensors measure times eo. Or...

Q = Sum E x eo

what happens :-) However, we now know how a secondary coil's voltage is

distributed. It is a sine shaped distribution along the length of the coil.

The top of the coil and terminal are at the same potential while the base is

grounded. Thus we can set up a computer simulation to find the electric field

around the coil given it's dimensions. The finite element analysis technique

to do this is well known by people who worry about such things. It is really

very simple but takes a very large number of calculations. So the computer

can crunch out the field distribution. Our task (the computer's task) is to

simply place a virtual surface around the coil and add up all the flux passing

through it. The surface can simply be a sphere with the Tesla coil contained

inside it. This is the simplest surface to use for our needs. There are no

unknowns here. Just Gauss's wonderful relation, some simple math and one heck

of a lot of calculation. We have the relation, the math is straight forward,

and modern computers can easily do the calculations in some reasonable time frame.

So we have all the parts. So... would someone please write a program to do this?...

Too late! :-)) I couldn't wait. It is still an alpha version but I think it works well. It is called TWFreq and is available at my site:

www.peakpeak.com/~terryf/tesla/misc/twfreq.zip

included since modern OSs don't have it anymore). It will run on any PC.

It will run in a DOS window on NT and the like. If it works out, someone can

rewrite it in some nice language since it is short, simple, and straightforward.

Programming is not one of my strong points... I hear there are DOS emulators for

Macs. If so, it should work fine on those too. This is a straight text based

program with no fancy stuff. It can be converted to any computer's BASIC

programming language (it needs more than 8k of RAM :-)). Nothing fancy. Expect

it to take at least a few hours to get down to a stable number. The extra cash

you paid for the faster computer will pay off now. It writes the voltage field

data to disk periodically so you can print the field plots out if you have Excel97

or some other program that can do surface plotting. It can be modified to do

field stress too very easily. It only does one terminal but two terminals or other

configurations would be easy to add. Just a matter of putting the shape in.

sent to me for fixing. The program works fine on my system and the parts I can

mix and match together but only a real field test will insure it "really" works.

If you know your system well, please report the accuracy to me so I can determine

if there are any weak spots and come up with a good number for claimed accuracy.

There are no "fudge" factors in it now but that could change :-))

This program has never been field tested before so the guarantees are zero. However, it should work. I hope it works out. It will fill a one of the few holes we have left in Tesla coil design for the armchair coiler...

Good luck! We'll blame Karl if it doesn't work :-))

Terry terryf@xxxxxxxxxxx

Cheers,

Terry

Jared Dwarshuis, Larry Morris March 05

- Prev by Date:
**Re: 3rd harmonic trap** - Next by Date:
**Re: Getting to the limit with an NST powered SGTC** - Previous by thread:
**Re: LC derivation II** - Next by thread:
**Re: Half wave/ bipolar coil** - Index(es):